Bring On The Meat!

Crazy PETA Lady in Austin. Film at 11:00

Well folks, after my short absence I'm back with more absurdity on the Texas front. And boy oh boy, is this something good for you. Seems as if this little ditty has made the local news (I even heard something about it on Houston's morning news). Now I ask you, what is wrong with this crazy lady not wanting animals hurt in the property she owns? Nothing! It's her property, and she has the right to select which types of businesses she will lease to. Answer me this: if this were a righteous Baptist owner who was choosing not to rent his property to a liquor store, would it have made the news? Or how about someone choosing not to rent their property to an adult video store? Odds are, it wouldn't have made a single headline. However, because this lady's beliefs aren't widely held (especially in Texas, the land of meat and beer), she gets ridiculed. There is even a movement in the Houston.eats newsgroup to go throw meat at her property.

With that being said, I do think the woman is crazy. Crazy as a loon. Now, I'm as big a fan as anyone to chucking meat, and doggone it I love me the taste of a dead animal, but why vandalize this woman's property? You can choose not to support her by not visiting the shops in her properties, but that will mainly hurt the people who run the shops, not the owner of the building. So you just wait for her to die. And when that happens, you eat a fat juicy steak in her memory.

If you're going to be anti-PETA (which is what this amounts to), why not beat one of those flower-pushing pansies to a bloody pulp the next time you see them demonstrate against meat eaters and fur wearers? I must tell you, I have a plot in mind to walk the streets of the West Coast wearing fur one day. And the second one of those tree-hugging bastards violates my choice to wear dead animals by throwing paint on me, I'll be throwing back a beaker of acid.

Categories

3 Comments

Ulysses said:

"Answer me this: if this were a righteous Baptist owner who was choosing not to rent his property to a liquor store, would it have made the news? Or how about someone choosing not to rent their property to an adult video store? Odds are, it wouldn't have made a single headline."

One tiny quibble: Both of the above imply a scenario where the renter is made aware of the policy before establishing the business. That is, it's one thing to tell somebody they can't open a business that does those things, quite another to boot one out that's already up and running.

Uber said:

Fair nuff. Say someone is "Saved" in the middle of their tenant's lease, and chooses to enforce said policy. Would it still make headlines?

Ulysses said:

My hunch in that case is yes, it would be news. Remember that the religiously zealous are always good fodder for a news story.



Powered by Movable Type 4.01-beta2